Why Brash Games Should Apologize

[Note from Jim: Ben McCurry made headlines last week for his amazing review of Pac-Man 256, in which he detailed the shoddy business practices of his own publication knowing full well they wouldn’t check it before it went up.

Brash Games, his previous employer (read: exploiter) has become notorious for not paying staff, altering writers’ review scores, and removing credit for work if somebody quits. Since Brash doesn’t pay its writers, I decided to pay a former Brash writer to talk about his experience. Because I can. 

There will also be more on Brash this Monday. You know what that means.

I now hand you over to Ben McCurry himself!]

After I’d finished furiously typing out the now-infamous Pac-Man 256 review last week, I didn’t know what was going to happen. I was, at that point, just a disgruntled employee who wanted to stick it to my editor as I walked out the door, intending to show the world what he was up to as I buggered off, never to be heard from again. If I could contribute anything for the next generation of freelance game writers, it would have been that they never had their emails darkened by the opportunistic Paul Ryan ever again.

As such, when I quietly uploaded it to Brash Games, I shrugged and hoped for a handful of people to find it funny and useful. I then ate pizza, played San Andreas, and went to bed.

To put it shortly, I was not ready for the ensuing chaos and the unravelling of Brash Games. For those uninitiated, the Brash Games fiasco started with a whisper, or, more accurately, a tweet.

Brash Games is an English gaming hobbyist site that recently landed in an Olympic- sized swimming pool of hot water due to extremely shady practices exposed by former writers. Thanks to the work of Meg Read and Olly Smith, Brash Games’ most elementary case of malpractice came to light on Twitter when they revealed their by-lines had been removed by the editor without warning and replaced with the credit “Brash Games,” encouraging others to check if theirs had followed suit into the void.

No matter if you leave a publication on the best of terms or if you’ve just been found in bed with the editor’s wife (not my situation), nobody should ever have their credits removed for simply departing.

This was later compounded by my realization that Brash Games was listed as “Out of Business” on GameRankings, and that their pages had been removed not just from OpenCritic, but from the Wayback Machine too. Also adding cause for concern was how Brash had a penchant for breaking embargoes, most recently for Yooka-Laylee.

I wasn’t entirely sure of the extent of the damage then. I was only sure of two things: Brash Games was a dead-end, and – in the words of Owen Hart – enough was enough and it was time for a change.

I wrote an extremely polite letter to Mr Ryan giving my notice, explaining I was doing so regarding the changing of by-lines and the removal of public records. I hadn’t worked at Brash Games for even a month, but there was zero point in staying if my work was eventually going to get accredited to Brash (and by proxy, Paul Ryan) so I decided to cut my losses entirely.

I asked him plainly why he had made the portfolios of young writers useless, and that I’d be finished after publishing the Pac-Man 256 review as an act of goodwill. By that, I meant I’d write a proper review; no jokes, no tricks, I would bow out respectfully and allow Meg, Olly, and others to continue the positive work they’d been doing. After all, I was a nobody, and I didn’t really have a stake in the fight.

That was until Paul Ryan completely ignored my email. I knew he’d read it because I’d been quietly removed from the staff list, but he ignored me and that was enough – to have zero decency, and to disrespect me like this when he’d been caught red-handed? It was a slap in the face [“Hehe – Jim], and if he wasn’t listening to me, I was going to make him pay attention. Thus, I wrote the review.

For those who haven’t read it yet, I exposed the business practices of Brash Games in a series of sneaky asides as I talked about Pac-Man 256, very explicitly resigning at the end.

Paul has tried to quiet the storm by taking it down, but it’s now been archived about a thousand times. Oops.

I tried as earnestly as possible to properly review the two- year-old game, and I did – I felt I gave it some good praise within the scope of review, and I eventually gave it 9/10, but ultimately the game was a vehicle to highlight and call out Brash for what they were doing. The intent was to gain a bit of attention and put Paul Ryan on the spot, as I didn’t want him to be able to dismiss these issues easily; I did it in the most public and humiliating way possible.

If I had done my resignation as an open letter or a blog, it would have only gotten lost in the internet void; Paul could have pretended everything was fine, and this article wouldn’t be on The Jimquisition website right now. I may have been a firestarter, but at least people sat up and took notice when the smoke started to rise. Most have told me they enjoyed the review, which I greatly appreciate.

A few people have come out of the woodwork to tell me I was unprofessional. Personally, I think some people have their priorities twisted if they believe I’m a bad guy for “disgracing” a video game and – this was actually said! – the medium of reviews, when there was a much greater problem staring them in the face, but I guess facts aren’t accounted for in the “who’s the cleverest man on social media” contest.

I’m still laughing at the idea that I gave the game a 1/10. I didn’t – I awarded a 1 to protest how Mr Ryan changes scores to either appease publishers or mimic Metacritic, making a reviewer’s opinion on any given score redundant, and my real rating lies in the text clear as day. This has been an issue suffered time and time again by other Brash Games alumni.

The review contained some scathing (and completely verifiable) commentary on what Brash did where I quit in a public and humiliating way, and I make no apologies for any single comment. If I did this to any other publication, I would be blacklisted universally, and I would accept that, but the simple fact is this: I can’t be unprofessional on a website that has done nothing but act unprofessionally for years.

A quick side note about how I could do this so easily: Brash Games uses the WordPress content management system as many sites do, but the publication has absolutely zero editing or mediation process. Contributors are free to post their reviews without even so much as a glance from the editor to prevent what I did from happening; as long as reviews “look alright”, Paul never passes on much of anything in the way of commentary or feedback. So much for calling himself an editor – it felt like he was more interested in calling himself the boss rather than acting like it, and when it came to “review o’clock,” as he called it, he wasn’t anywhere to be seen.

This was one of the most frustrating things about working for him, the fact that it was a sterile and soulless experience with very little camaraderie to speak of.

The only person I ever spoke to, besides a colleague I knew from previous work, was Paul, and he only emailed me to throw the hilariously outdated list of games my way. These were filled with shovelware, some two years old; with colleague Thomas Hughes identifying a good deal of them as Humble Bundle purchases. This is not illegal, just shady – especially as Brash’s list of “clients” includes an image lifted directly from Nintendo’s website.

I can’t speak on what Paul’s relationship was like with developers; all I can comment is that using Humble Bundle as a source for games is a serious cause for concern, especially when PR and asking for review codes is not difficult. What I can say is that I never received any guidance – professional or otherwise – from the man, and working under him just left me spinning my wheels.

What I did was just the straw that broke the camel’s back; the smallest piece of the puzzle that probably had the greatest consequence – what came out next was truly unbelievable and escalated the Brash Games affair from “iffy” to “scandalous”.

Olly, Meg, and I had been scooping up as much information as we could on the website, trying to piece everything together in light of an impending OpenCritic report on Brash Games and Paul Ryan. With the release of the Pac-Man 256 review/resignation, more disenfranchised Brash alumni joined the fray.

Kay Purcell came forward and told me her struggles with Paul Ryan and the web hosts of Brash, Freeola, and that they had been ignoring and outright rejecting her pleas to get the content that she had written removed from the website.

Worse for Paul, OpenCritic confirmed that by-lines and scores had been changed – whilst Paul had excluded Brash from the Wayback Machine, he had no idea that OpenCritic had their own internal Wayback that took HTML “screenshots” of reviews as soon as they went live [“HAHAHA” – Jim]. As it stands, they have the data – and it proves that articles were written by original authors as opposed to Brash Games, as well as retaining all original scores.

Finally, Paul responded with an internal staff email hurriedly sent on the Sunday after the review dropped – two days later. Amusingly, I was still on the mailing list, even after what I had done, so I received the full text. Most of it was libellous nonsense and dark claims about me and past writers. Paul brazenly suggested that ex-writers had been “contacting publishers & devs for months requesting codes on behalf of Brash Games.”

I can’t speak on behalf of anyone else, although other ex-writers have soundly denied this. As for me, I have my own website called Ludotempus, and even in its small infant state, it has more positive cache than Brash ever will – as such, I simply have no need to use anyone else’s name to obtain review codes.

Paul also defended deleting “old” accounts from the site, saying this was not done without provocation, yet was keen to point out those with positive relationships with Brash still remained, citing a Tom Leclerc as an example. Aside from myself, many others left the site on completely positive terms, making Paul’s claims another lie, but that’s not the story here – Paul Ryan and Tom Leclerc have known each other for at least 13 years, with Leclerc being a regular contributor for Ryan’s old site Ace Gamez. The two men are friends, being listed as such on Facebook, and it’s more than likely that this is the reason Leclerc gets to keep his credits.

Ryan lambasted contributors for not producing reviews quickly enough, regularly placing the blame on freelance workers for daring to write for other outlets – excuse us for trying to make a living, Paul – but even then, working for other sites was something that was always encouraged by the editor – Paul even went to the length of trying (and failing) to poach contributors from other websites.

Finally, in direct response to changing review scores, Paul argues that he only ever did this with full consultation from writers, such as the author of the Toy Odyssey review. In actuality, all writers who have suffered this corroborate that nothing was ever ran by them – it was just done under their noses. It felt like Paul didn’t truly respect us as his staff, which is what made it easier to post my review under his nose.

Things got truly calamitous with the release of two exposé videos by Kirioth. A great deal of his findings coincide with mine, but he unearthed something very interesting that warrants renewed interest.

There are dozens of articles attributed to the writer David James, and most of them contain advertorials to gambling websites that read like they were paid for. If this is the case, Brash Games were, and still are, featuring paid advertorials on their website under the guise of articles without properly stating they were advertisements – I’m in no way a legal or advertising expert, but Paul Ryan can probably expect a letter from the Advertising Standards Agency very soon.

This perhaps gives a good indication of how exactly Brash were making money, especially considering they have surprisingly poor engagement on social media for having 115K+ Twitter followers. Bots? Paid-for followers? Crowdfire automation? I don’t have a concrete idea.

More intriguing is the emergence of David James. After the Brash Games controversy escalated over the last few days, Paul Ryan entirely removed himself as the owner of the website, attributing all contents and copyrights to David James. I tried to track down David James for comment, but all one can find is reference to the former England football team’s goalkeeper.

David James seems to only exist within the vacuum of Brash Games, which presents some odd possibilities – is David James even a real person? Is he a front for someone else? I find it hard to believe that he’s just a man that really, really loves gambling, especially considering how quickly ownership of Brash was passed to him.

While I have the microphone for 15 minutes, I’d like to tell two personal stories told to me by former Brash writers that will solidify what kind of human being Paul Ryan is; we know more than enough about how he does business, but just in case you think this is all a misunderstanding: no, this man is as terrible as has been reported.

The first is from Dylan Chaundy, a fellow former writer who told me that Paul Ryan asked him to change Wikipedia articles for the benefit of Brash Games, such as inserting review scores and links to Brash on relevant pages in order to put eyes on the website. This is, of course, an ethical nightmare and an absolutely unacceptable request for an editor and boss to make.

However, I think the story I’m about to tell now beats everything you’ve ever heard about Brash.

Another contributor who chooses to remain anonymous talks of how Paul regarded his mental illness. Only the full, unabridged quotation from Paul Ryan to the writer in question will do:

“I gave you the benefit off the doubt last time and even though you posted all that crap that started all this I still took you back after no-one else would touch you with a bargepole as I understand mental illness and the effects it has on you but I should have listened to the devs who sent you codes via TA for your own blog that never materialised.”

Paul Ryan openly told one of his employees that mental illness made him unemployable in a ploy to get that employee to return. This is disgusting. The outright lying, the removal of bylines, the libellous accusations, these were bad enough, but this? To drag mental illness into the fray, suggesting it makes a writer undesirable? Absolutely sickening.

Paul Ryan is irredeemable. Brash Games is irredeemable. Its practices are Draconian as far as games media goes and have no place in any professional environment, even if their writers are volunteers. Nothing excuses any of this. Due to how they’ve treated their staff, I’d like to tell Paul Ryan precisely what it is I want from him.

What do I want most? Apart from world peace, a jetpack, and for my girlfriend to live closer to me, I want Paul Ryan to apologise – and right now, Paul, I’m talking directly to you.

Everyone else reading this article may as well not exist; this is between you and me; and I hope wherever you are, you’re feeling yourself twitch in your desk chair. I want you to apologise to me, Meg Read, Olly Smith, Thomas Hughes, Dylan Chaundy, Llewelyn Griffiths, Luke Ladlee, Mark Brearley, and everyone else under the Brash banner that you have used and abused over the years, stealing their work for your gain.

You’ve used them to build a fat portfolio for yourself so you and David James – whoever that is, it doesn’t matter – make a cool profit on all those gambling editorials you’ve ran with zero disclosure. Save a bit of face, be professional, and protect the next batch of kids from becoming totally disillusioned with games writing.

Apologies for being so brash, but we trusted you, and you abused that trust for your own gain. It is, sadly, people like Paul Ryan and Brash Games that give games journalism the terrible name it currently has. No more.

Paul Ryan is a relic of the past, and that’s exactly where he and Brash Games should be left.

magemasher13
Guest
magemasher13

I’ve never heard of Brash games and I’m glad of that fact. Gaming press will never reach the standards of journalism unless we gamers publicly and loudly force them to. Sites like Polygon and Kotaku are just as bad as Brash games and we need to hold them accountable as well.

Otherhand
Guest
Otherhand

You’re against poor journalistic standards in the games media, and you pick out Kotaku: perhaps the most advanced advocates of actual journalistic standards in the games press? They’re by no means impeccable, but their policies have been ahead of the curve since long before Gamergate appeared.

The fact that you pull them up and pair them with Polygon makes me question your real motives here. The major thing those sites share is their political leanings.

K. Scott Ross
Guest

My thought as well. When I hear anyone talking about “ethics in games journalism” and pointing at the liberal/progressive websites, I get a headache from how hard my eyes roll.

Sam Hamer
Guest
Sam Hamer

The major thing those sites share is being awful.

Twinkling82
Guest

Two of my favourite sites. Funny.

Nathan Aldana
Guest
Nathan Aldana

awful by what metric? and what would you consider a good site?

Sam Hamer
Guest
Sam Hamer

For video game related news, criticism, discussion? YouTube. The only written and publicised material in that vein which I give any real credit to can be found in N64 Magazine.

Articuno76
Guest
Articuno76
Advocating standards and working to them are two different things. I’ve seen some of the worst articles from Kotaku. Articles which are less than a paragraph long and are missing the accompanying video/picture they are (I think?) referring to. Things that just left the commenters scratching their heads as to why anyone would consider them newsworthy, or outright factual inaccuracies. And that’s not even getting into their putrid fascination with sex which has led to articles that are basically on par with fart jokes. Polygon at least TRIES. You don’t even have to read the articles to tell that (the… Read more »
Twinkling82
Guest

you sure those one-paragraph articles/posts aren’t from the userbased end of the site?

Articuno76
Guest
Articuno76

They were on the front page. And in one instance I distinctly recall the author being a familiar regular.

It looked like they’d submitted a draft by accident or something.

SaburoDaimando
Guest
SaburoDaimando

I never heard of this before.

Vaughan MacDonald
Guest
Vaughan MacDonald

Something tells me we’ll all be hearing a lot more about it in the weeks to come.

Anthony Montoya
Guest
Anthony Montoya

Who is David James you ask? He’s a phantom, an apparition, second cousin to Harvey the Rabbit, Paul conjured him up out of thin air. He doesn’t exist, except on paper.

Eon264
Guest
Eon264

He’s Pauls Keyser Soze.

Chürz
Guest
Chürz

Never heard of them, but they go into the “shitty companies” sack.

Terriosaurus Hex
Guest
Terriosaurus Hex
Am glad to see there are still those not averse to whistleblowing in all its’ various forms. This kind of piece is worth more than a thousand “exclusive previews”, “top ten vidja-gam bad Bois” or “EA’s CEO said something stupid again” …There probably isn’t any number of that shit that would be. Whether there is any justice to be had here though, time will tell. But the more people that know, the less likely this half-assed manipulator can take advantage of others in future. Perhaps the gambling stuff will bite him in the bollocks hard enough. What is it with… Read more »
AntarcticOasis
Guest
AntarcticOasis

Thank you for writing this. It goes without saying that what you’ve written is brave, yes, but also important and I hope it gets the attention it deserves.

Landy Alexander
Guest
Landy Alexander

Can we just call the one who runs Brash ‘Paulson Ryan’? I know a Paul, and he’s a shitstain politician.

Gabriel Cavalcanti
Guest
Gabriel Cavalcanti
It’s a real shame that that’s not by far the only shady website out there. N4G is FILLED with poorly run websites that rely solely on clickbaits. Their writing is atrocious and their “articles” always get approved. It’s because of them and people like “Paul Ryan” (at this point I’m starting to believe that’s not his real name) that, whenever someone says something just a little controversial, we get comments with “journalist” between quotes. What’s even worse is that that’s something the video game industry struggles with, be it in development or journalism. There’s a huge amount of unprofessionalism surrounding… Read more »
smek2
Guest
smek2

We’re talking about a fat dude, who gave Call of Juarez Gunslinger a 8.5/10, so yeah, his opinion and all. Enjoy your measly patreon bucks, because god knows, you don’t make any money off on Youtube.

Jeddostotle7
Guest
Jeddostotle7

….What the fuck?? What the fuck does Jim’s review of Call of Juarez: Gunslinger have to do with this article that is written neither by Jim nor about Jim?

Jarin
Guest
Jarin

Paul, is that you?

Terriosaurus Hex
Guest
Terriosaurus Hex

My thought precisely. 😉

Matthew Burt
Guest
Matthew Burt

No shit he doesn’t make money off YouTube. Jim states pretty clearly that JQ will remain unmonetized.

qorl123
Guest
qorl123

Jimquisition is unmonetized, but he does get a bit of money from youtube for other vids

Sned
Guest
Sned

Inb4 this comment gets pinned.

Gabriel Cavalcanti
Guest
Gabriel Cavalcanti

Scanning for relevance. Failed to locate. Terminating process. Blip blop.

Fallen Prime
Guest
Fallen Prime

This isn’t even Jim, genius.

Scott Stenger
Guest
Scott Stenger

I’m confused, is 8.5 good or bad? Cause to me that’s a damn good score for a damn good game.

Mike Hoyer
Guest
Mike Hoyer

Because Zelda only got a 7. They’re just leaving that part off now because people like this always assume everyone else will know what they’re talking about, because it is the most important thing.

Scott Stenger
Guest
Scott Stenger

Oh sorry, I forgot the fateful day when Jim ruined games for everyone forever.

Fallen Prime
Guest
Fallen Prime

Don McLean wrote about the day the MC score died.

“Bye, bye, Mr. Breath of the Wild…”

Drake Warnock
Guest
Drake Warnock

How could you forget? I think all technology just failed everywhere and we are all now living in caves hallucinating the internet.

K. Scott Ross
Guest

This explains a lot.

Twinkling82
Guest

So that’s whats happening, I think I have some VR goggles on…

Артём Андреев
Guest
Артём Андреев

Zelda got a 7 and Call of Juarez: Gunslinger got a 8.5?
Good.

Mike Hoyer
Guest
Mike Hoyer

I just want to point out for anyone that missed it, too. The insult here is “You don’t even make money off captive advertising people just choose to pay you directly of their own free will.”

Nathan Aldana
Guest
Nathan Aldana

well, to people who worship capitalism, they apparently find the thought of not monetizing people in unethical ways to be the worst

Viggo
Guest
Viggo

“This user’s activity is private “

Fallen Prime
Guest
Fallen Prime

That’s the one that gets me. I’ve said some shit in the past on Disqus that I’m not proud of – coming immediately to mind is a semantics argument about the use of the word “faggotry” – but I still have my comment history wide open because I’m not afraid of being taken to task for my past mistakes.

If the context is appropriate, I mean. Using something I said as a smoking gun to shut me up in an argument that has nothing to do with the thing I said is not on.

Viggo
Guest
Viggo

There’s something to be said about people wanting to hide their behavior.

La Chica Incognita
Guest
La Chica Incognita
You’re just sad. I mean this in the very real and not at all meant to be used as an insulting kind of way. I think about what kind of person you are outside of the internet and the safety of your computer and ponder what has the world has done to mess you up this badly. How tiny is your self esteem that you have to go out and insult a random person for their opinion and insult their physical appearance (and just by the by I’m presuming you’re at least as obese if not more obese then Jim… Read more »
Steve
Guest
Steve

Very well said.

Muddy Scarecrow
Guest
Muddy Scarecrow

This comment doesn’t even sound like it’s for this article. Did you get lost on your way to the Sexy Brutale review?

Ffordesoon
Guest
Ffordesoon

This may be the single dumbest comment I have ever read on a videogame website which did not also have a slur in it. It’s, like, fractally stupid; every time I look at it, I notice another facet of idiocy. I’m almost impressed.

Otherhand
Guest
Otherhand

Did he? Good. I consider that game my favourite FPS of all time, still. It’s an excellent game: charming, stylish, creative and concise. Whenever I show the game to friends who’ve never heard of it, I virtually have to peel them off my controller.

That’s not a particularly unusual rating, iirc. It was very well received and still has a great user rating on Steam.

philosophix
Guest

So are you here about the slap in the face, or the final betrayal?

K. Scott Ross
Guest

I almost fell out of my chair.

HandsomePeasant
Guest
HandsomePeasant

As confused as I am about your comment, it’s clear that you are far more confused than I could ever be.

TheVorpalPen
Guest
TheVorpalPen

Bit of a lazy excuse for a troll. Low hanging fruit. But that said hey guys remember Call of Juarez? I did nothing but play that game…. good times…

David Feichtner
Guest
David Feichtner

Man… video game journalism ethics have gone through the roof since #GamerGate harassed all those women and minorities.
Sargon is in heaven, all is good!

SilentPony
Guest
SilentPony

I didn’t know Phil Fish was both transgender and transracial! Jeez, now I feel bad for disagreeing with his racketeering scheme.

Just goes to show you never judge a person by their actions, only by their gender and race.

David Feichtner
Guest
David Feichtner

Does he deserve legal ramifications? I don’t know, I’m not a lawyer.
Does he deserve sad fuckfaces harassing him? No, because you are not a branch of the judicial system. You are a lynch-mob that’s too lazy to make some torches.
And do you really have any leg to stand on about “identity politics” when one of the key GG allies basically starts every second sentence with “I am a gay jew who likes black dick!” ?

SilentPony
Guest
SilentPony

Identity politics is, by definition, bullshit. Its just a concept people came up with when they couldn’t defend their position anymore, so they wanted to attack someone else.

Go ahead and disagree with Milo because he’s gay, or Jewish or conservative, none of which is actually a crime.

I’ll disagree with Fish ’cause he’s a criminal.

David Feichtner
Guest
David Feichtner

I disagree with Milo because he is a cowardly worm who hides behind “gay, Jewish, not racist”. And you should too.
But Gamergate was never about “disagreeing” with people. It was about shutting them up and if it happened across a real criminal by accident (because that was never the real reason) then I don’t automatically agree with the criminal just because I disagree with you.

Twinkling82
Guest

CRIMINAL?! elaborate.

YoDude
Guest
YoDude

The game community at large is fairly unknown to me. I remember Fish being the dude who made Fez. But what does he have to do with Gamergate?

Honestly though, I’m not one hundred percent on Gamergate either.

Andrzej Sugier
Guest
Andrzej Sugier

Oh, Phil Fish wasn’t really connected to GG, he’s just a good old asshole.
George Weidman (Superbunnyhop on youtube) did a nice, concise piece on all his antics if you’re interested.

Twinkling82
Guest

Pretty sure I saw a clip from a panel where Fish was on, and he talked a bit about GamerGate and gamer culture. It might have been in one of the indie movies, pretty sure both are on netflix worldwide – and they are to be found on steam as well I think.

qorl123
Guest
qorl123

Phil Fish may be a huge asshole but his opinion of gamergate was spot on. He might have had a decent point about gamer culture as well.

Wolf
Guest
Wolf

Good for you for exposing this inexcusably malignant behaviour. All the best, hope you get picked up by one of the big sites soon man, your writing is great. Your pacman review was first class, ‘hidden’ messages notwithstanding.

BewareTheForce
Guest
BewareTheForce

Fuck Paul Ryan for making me have to re-read that insult multiple times to figure out what it said.

Human Bean
Guest
Human Bean

After having read that review… damn, Ben really has balls of steel for doing that!

Mike Hoyer
Guest
Mike Hoyer

Well at least they didn’t do anything REALLY bad like hire a woman or give a bad score to a Zelda game.

Seriously though, thank you for this, Ben, and for the original “review”.

Gabriel Cavalcanti
Guest
Gabriel Cavalcanti

They did hire women. A few are mentioned here.

Mike Hoyer
Guest
Mike Hoyer

Yeah but “gave a good review to a woman designer” or “hired a woman as a social media manager” kind of messed with the flow of the joke.
I was going to give you guff for taking it too literally but I don’t have it in me given the sincerity of your other post above.

Gabriel Cavalcanti
Guest
Gabriel Cavalcanti

Oh, that’s like, relating to those issues we had in the past? My bad, I can miss a joke sometimes. I did get the Zelda one, but the woman part made a little confused o-o But then, I was a bit “triggered” after reading this piece, being part of the market it relates to and all. My apologies if I took it too literally xD

Nathan Aldana
Guest
Nathan Aldana

Theres a certain hilarious irony in that there are apparently two men in the world named Paul Ryan with apparently identically twisted moral compasses.

Ffordesoon
Guest
Ffordesoon

Haha, that’s what I was thinking. What if everyone in the world named Paul Ryan is an ethical void? That would be amazing.

Eon264
Guest
Eon264

I think you mean terrifying. For all we know this could mean there’s a huge sleeper cell of Paul Ryan’s who are just waiting for an opportunity to get their slime everywhere.

SilasBodnick
Guest
SilasBodnick

I realized this was a guest post as soon as I read the title. Jim would never ask someone to apologize. Ugh! We’re in this grievance, apology culture. Just call out a bastard for fucking up – don’t ask him to apologize for it. That this is so WEAK. And when this report calls out the true whistle-blower for engaging in “digital vandalism” – don’t ask for their apologies either… Just call shit out so we all know who we’re dealing with.

DNutty12345
Guest
DNutty12345

sorry the vary notion of apologizing triggered your fragile little mind, go back to your safe space you easily offended run of the mill whiny little bitch

Jarin
Guest
Jarin

And apparently you stopped reading at the title, too. Good job.

Pocket
Guest
Pocket
I’ve never even heard of these guys, which I guess just goes to show that a site doesn’t have to become a big deal before they go bad. Anyway, I wonder if we’ll ever see a similar takedown of the Escapist, another “gamez journalism” site that belongs in the garbage can. I know you said at the time that your forced resignation had nothing to do with your criticism of You Know What, but it has since come to light that Bob Chipman’s and Susan Arnendt’s definitely did, and the shady circumstances surrounding Extra Credits’ departure have been well known… Read more »
Wolfie
Guest
Wolfie
It wasn’t just front either; there was a lot of shit going on in the forums as well. Whenever “those people” would get in trouble, they’d complain to the people above the mods and magically they’re back right at it again! Banned for a week? Back in two days. While those who were critical of “those people” got the short end of the stick because we didn’t buy into the bullshit or stoop to playing dirty. Hell, one of their best mods, I hear, left after they opened up a section in the forum that was wholly and specifically unmoderated.… Read more »
CaitSeith
Guest
CaitSeith

Yeah, there is still at least half a dozen of them in the Industry discussion. But there is always someone there to be critical, balancing the things out.

Wolfie
Guest
Wolfie

Really? Poor bastards.

qorl123
Guest
qorl123

What’s this about moviebob and extra credits? I don’t want to read Encyclopedia Dramatica’s take on it….

A. Nobody
Guest
A. Nobody

Don’t know about Bob Chipman, but EC’s artist had some kind of injury impacting her ability to work back when they were still at the Escapist and EC did a crowdfunding campaign in order to help pay for her surgery.

The campaign was hugely successful, but once it was over the Escapist claimed that they had the right to a percentage of the proceeds.

IIRC, EC refuted the claim and promptly left the site, after which there was some additional disputes about who owned the rights to the EC episodes published while under the Escapist banner.

Terriosaurus Hex
Guest
Terriosaurus Hex

The comment is weirdly awaiting moderation and i cant comment directly, so am shamelessly piggybacking yours to say…Why is it now awaiting moderation? Has it been flagged by somebody? It obviously wasn’t originally the case if others could comment. I am suspicious much so.

CaptainDustTree
Guest
CaptainDustTree

A lot of stuff gets flagged automatically on this site’s Disqus. It could be the Ethics in James Gournalism that set off an automatic moderation

Mathew G. Smith
Guest
Mathew G. Smith

Didn’t the Escapist get bought out and stripped down a while back? They post almost nothing now, and all the original content except Zero Punctuation is long gone.

CaitSeith
Guest
CaitSeith

Escapist didn’t renew MovieBob’s working contract that just happened to end when the things were heated up a couple years ago.

Extra Credits received donations for a medical surgery for one of their members via Rockethub, and they had a dispute with the Escapist (where they were hosted way back then) about that money.

Molly
Guest
Molly

Damn, that’s some shit. Way to put Brash through the wringer!

astra
Guest
astra

Man this paul guy is a persona 5 villain lol
Good luck getting that apology without the metaverse

PhyrePhox
Guest
PhyrePhox

Ben McCurry, good on you, sir! What you and your fellow writers had to endure at Brash games is nothing short of despicable. If there is any justice left in the world, then Paul Ryan will get blindsided by Karma at her worst (more than has already happened by the misdeeds being dragged into the light like screaming vampires).

I wish you the absolute best in your future endeavors. Thank God for your honesty, and Thank God for Jim F*cking Sterling, son!

Matt
Guest
Matt

I know it’s wrong, but my headcanon is definitely that House Speaker Paul Ryan moonlights as a shady ‘game journalism’ company. It’s a fun way to look at events.

gibbyo
Guest
gibbyo

“To put it shortly, I was not ready for the ensuing chaos and the unravelling of Brash Games. For those uninitiated, the Brash Games fiasco started with a whisper, or, more accurately, a tweet.” Oooh. Very The Exorcist!

DaTruth
Guest
DaTruth
Ahaha 3-1 that ‘David James’ doesn’t exist at all. Sounds like a paper man made up to take the blame while Ryan runs away. He wouldn’t be the first person to try and make a fake paper trail. I get the feeling Paul Ryan will be relocating to a non extradite country very soon as he cashes out his profits from being a scum bag and if there is a God will be found dead with his organs cut out in a bath tub in or a ditch in a year or two if there is any justice in the… Read more »
Sylocat
Guest

Come to think of it, are we SURE it’s not the same Paul Ryan?

Wolf
Guest
Wolf

Never seen them in the same place at the same time?!?! The plot thickens!

Wolfie
Guest
Wolfie

I’d suggest we get DNA samples to test, but that’d mean one of us would have to get close to either of them.

LatePocketwatch
Guest
LatePocketwatch

That’s what drones are for.

Roger Edwards
Guest

Douglas Wilmer. An underrated Sherlock Holmes.